Did you know?

RE: Supports PETG Tips and Settings. I found that tree supports are the easiest to remove and impact the surface finish the least. Prusa slicer doesn't support tree supports yet. I used them in Cura on my Ender 3 and they were great.PrusaSlicer 2.1 custom support example, and checking out other new features. i use both prusaslicer and cura regularly, so i like to test new versions and fe...RE: PrusaSlicer hard to remove supports. Hi Edward, I had the same issue. I found a thread in this forum (somewhere 😀 ) that the the standard 0.1 mm contact z distance should be 0.15 mm. You can find that setting in the tab Print Settings under Support material. Play with this setting, until you find the right balance between support and ...But if you want to play with them, download the alpha 2 or 3 then load a model you want to use them on, open the Paint-on supports Gizmo, select Automatic painting. when its done enable for "support enforcers only" then go to Print Settings\Support material\Style: and from the drop down menu select Organic. It would …Somebody has to look into the supports in a one long session. Unfortunately we did not have time for it until the PrusaSlicer 2.0.0 release was out. Now we need to implement the Undo / Redo (one feature that people are crying for the most) and then we will have some time on our hands to concentrate on other things like the supports.Besides the obvious "if you select add for support enforcers only, you have to add support enforcers somewhere", the other part of the answer is, no, you can't avoid excessive supports. As much as I like PrusaSlicer, one of its main shortcomings is a super aggressive approach to adding supports, growing out way more than necessary.I tried painting on supports and using the organics. I have attempted every change I can under the interface (currently at 0) and with the branch adjustments to get the supports to even touch the model but they wont reach the model at all. there is a slight gap visible in prusa slicer (no dark green visible) between the model and the tree supports.PrusaSlicer doesn't have direct support for tree supports, at least not yet. You can fake it to an extend by selecting an SL1 printer, adding SLA-style supports, then exporting the build plate as an STL. Import that STL back into PrusaSlicer with a Mk3 selected and it works OK, but is not like Cura's tree supports. 2.Q: Does it have custom supports? A: Yes. Check the Paint-on supports and support blockers and enforcers. Q: How to orient my model so that one of its faces is on the print bed? A: Check the Place on Face function. Q: Can I schedule a pause or a color change in PrusaSlicer? A: Yes, click the plus icon on the slider in the Preview mode.RE: Feature Request - Export STL with Supports for Single Model. The 3mf files are great but my use-case isn't regarding sharing settings, rather it's a workflow issue I'm having. In my case, I'm using a non-Prusa resin printer so there's a workflow of: add supports to model in Prusa Slicer -> import to chitubox -> orient and slice -> import ...RE: PrusaSlicer hard to remove supports. Here's a quick comparison of supports I did a while back for ideaMaker, Simplify 3D, PrusaSlicer and Cura. PrusaSlicer is definitely the weakest in terms of appearance. The Cura result is a bit marred, but the non-tree supports look good. My personal preference is ideaMaker's result overall.AnkerMake M5 works best with the AnkerMake Slicer software developed by AnkerMake. The software is optimized to achieve high-speed printing. In addition, only the AnkerMake Slicer supports our AI recognition feature. For third party options, the AnkerMake M5 also supports Cura and PrusaSlicer in the future. As long as the format is gcode file ...On Klipper it speeds up a lot prints for example, Benchy on Super Slicer is 54min whereas Cura is 1hr 24min, these are exact same speeds no acceleration control and minimum layer times are set to 1 second on both. If you want to print fast, you should give Klipper a try.Automated supports are something I believe Cura is slightly better at. The same counts for settings. There are just so many adjustments you can define: Different parameters, and infill for different layer of the support; Normal and tree structure; Support placement, patters, overhang and so on; Canonical support to reduce the bottom-area of the ...Yes, tree support are very nice, that is indeed a feature I miss in PrusaSlicer, too. I still use Cura from time to time, but only on simple geometries with sharp edges. That seems to be where Cura shines. Cura has more features, no doubt about that. But I find PrusaSlicer just way more predictable - stuff like that just doesn't happen.You can try to create supports similar to Tree Supports in PrusaSlicer by using the SLA supports, then saving the STL and reimporting that file into the normal filament view and slicing it without supports. Cura has a support interface that makes it easier to produce successful results compared to PrusaSlicer, especially with functional 3D prints.Nevertheless, the features in version 2.6 are perhaps one of the biggest upgrades to PrusaSlicer in some time. Organic Supports. The flagship new feature is Organic Supports. These are a new variation of the earlier Tree Supports, but with far more intelligence and sophistication, leading to the change in name.

mysterious empty layer warnings. I use prusaslicer 2.3.0 on windows 10, with my thin walls detection on. Yesterday I sliced a bunch of files (without supports) with no issues or warnings, this morning I found something about the 'support cubic' infill setting and I sliced one of these files with that infill this morning and it came up with 3 empty layer warnings.While PrusaSlicer doesn't directly support tree supports for FDM/FFM printing, there is a way to work around it and make PrusaSlicer create tree supports. 1. In PrusaSlicer create a new printer profile for the Prusa SLA printer. 2. Set the bed size to the same as your FDM/FFM bed size. 3. Import the STL into the SLA profile and generate the ...PrusaSlicer: 36 hours, 1.1kg. This was with a 0.25 or 0.3 correction: 3.0mm space between rectangular supports, up from the default of 2mm. Cura (Tree supports): 16 hours, 510g . So either for shapes like this, tree vs traditional supports make an absolutely massive difference, or I just screwed up the PrusaSlicer settings somehow.As of version 2.6, there are organic supports in PrusaSlicer. This type of support uses less filament and is printed faster than the classic straight support...If it's set to none or build plate only, it still won't add them there even with an enforcer. Yes, even the "for enforcers only" does not add supports when it's sliced. I figured out a work around, which is to set supports to Everywhere and use blockers for the rest of the print. Under the support menu there is checkbox for bridging supports.

PrusaSlicer 2.6 je tady a přináší obrovské množství vylepšení! A to nejen ve formě nových nástrojů a funkcí, ale také zdokonalením jádra našeho softwaru - generování G-codu. ... jsou tzv. „Stromové podpěry" (Tree supports) - struktury koncipované tak, aby maximalizovaly úsporu materiálu a minimalizovaly čas ...Re: Tree supports. Yes, agreed. I was just looking at Cura when I posted the message. When I got my Mk3 last summer, I tried Cura. They had beta tree supports then as well. It looks to me there has been a big improvement with Cura tree supports since then. I eventually settled on SlicerPE because the quality of the print was better than Cura.…

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Right-click a model and select Height range modifi. Possible cause: They call tree support "organic" and it works extremely well for .